Four Functions Management Paper free essay sample

Functions of Management MGT/00 Essentials of College Writing July 22, 2011 Functions of Management The word Management describes as the method working with persons and resources in order to accomplish organizational goals (Bateman Snell, 2009). Other defines management as solving problem creatively via the functions of management (Adam, 2009). Accomplishing organizational goals require to posses basic steps in order to achieve the goals. There are four different functions of management planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. The following functions of management consist of the main functions of managers, which ought to carry out efficiently for the success of an organization or company (Expert Manage, n. d. ). Planning defines as specifying the goals to be attained and deciding in advance the appropriate actions needed to achieve those goals (Bateman Snell, 2009). Our organization, The Diocese of Tarlac is a non-profit organization. Our main objective is to have a great quality of service in our organization and community. Based from experience as an Altar Server at our organization; we plan first before executing anything. We will write a custom essay sample on Four Functions Management Paper or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page For an instance a special event will occur. We decide first the function of each member to specific work what the member will do. We plan systematic procedure then choreograph our plan. A great planning has a desirable outcome of our activity and service. Lack of planning that means not prepared or a bad planning has taken place. In addition, lack of planning may lead us to miscommunication that may lead also into undesirable results. Planning stated to as a base component of management that also involves developing strategies to achieve these goals, thus planning is constant process (Expert Manage, n. d. ). Organizing defines as assembling and coordinating the person, financial, physical, informational, and other resources needed to achieve (Bateman Snell, 2009). The organizing is a constituent of planning. Based on opinion organizing is form of planning but organizing compromises more on the function of a certain member. On this case on our organization as an altar server, the specific function that has been given role to us was assisting he mass and on call community service. Being specific what the altar servers do that there are two parts on our team, main and the assistant servers. The functions of the main servers are to assist the priest while the assistant servers are to assist the main servers although both function to assist mass. Our organizing process starts with our weekly meeting and agendas. Organ izing is a system within the organization to follow in order the group, employees, and members function efficiently. Organizing decreases miscommunication within the organization. Organizing also makes clear on limitations of our responsibility. Through a great organizing leads to a great teamwork and a great tool of establishing goodwill within the organization. Organizing also choosing the right people for the specific roles and delegate task to people (Expert Manage, n. d. ). Leading defines as stimulating people to be high performers (Bateman Snell, 2009). The management functions as well to motivate the member within the organization. Based from point of view we need to motivate members due to the fact of the human emotional and psychological needs. We need this to inspire other member. Within our organization in Diocese of Tarlac, a good motivational speech makes a good day to start with. Leading is one of the functions of management but it does not mean the organization will operate only with managers. The organization needs persons who have leadership skills. Leadership and manager are two different meanings and some people think they are the same. Leadership defines as the people who have capacity to lead toward a common goal while manager define as a person who conducts business or household affairs (Merriam-Webster, 2011). Controlling defines as the process, which ensures that the work is done in the desired way and evaluate that the plans are properly executed or implemented (Adam, 2009). Every organization wants to posses desirable results and by controlling, they can evaluate the performance in order to improve or make changes if they need so. Our organization at Diocese of Tarlac, they monitor us Altar Server through a leader who watches us during we perform, ask the celebrant to evaluate us and survey from the people. We can tell if the server needs to practice more through this method. Sometimes the strategies and plans that were developed and implemented may not work out as initially planned due to certain external factors (Expert Manage, n. d. ). We can improve and modify our plans according to the results of evaluation. These four functions help on the organization success. The management reflects on how these functions implement them. In addition, these functions enhance good communication and maximize the efficiency in order to achieve the organizational goals. References Adam. (2009). 4 Functions of Management. Retrieved July 22, 2011 from http://www. mba-tutorials. com/management/287-4-functions-of-management. html Bateman Snell. (2009). Foundations of Management. Management: Leading and Collaborating in a Competitive World (8th ed. ). Boston,MA: Mcgraw-Hill Irwin Expert Mange. (n. d. ) Four Functions of Management. Retrieved July 22, 2011 from http://www. expertmanage. com/in. d. ex. php? option=com_contentview=articleid=122Itemid=166 Merriam-Webster. (2011). Dictionary. Retrieved July 22, 2011 from http://www. merriam-webster. com/dictionary

Free Essays on The Clean Water Act

The Clean Water Act: Is it Working to Keep our Rivers and Streams Safe? Growing public awareness and concern for controlling water pollution led to enactment of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. As amended in 1977, this law became commonly known as the Clean Water Act. The Act established the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States. It gave EPA the authority to implement pollution control programs such as setting wastewater standards for industry. The Clean Water Act also continued requirements to set water quality standards for all contaminants in surface waters. The Act made it unlawful for any person to discharge any pollutant from a point source into navigable waters, unless a permit was obtained under its provisions. It also funded the construction of sewage treatment plants under the construction grants program and recognized the need for planning to address the critical problems posed by non-point source pollution. This act lays the footwork for how we live day to day and how we are supposed to protect our country ¡Ã‚ ¦s water supply, but is it working? Are we working to protect our water supply? How clean is our water? In this paper I intend to answer these questions and others that relate to this act and also of its effectiveness. Water Quality Reports For a 1998 report, all 52 states, 2 interstate river commissions, Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, and 9 American Indian tribes rated water quality. These states and tribes assessed conditions in 842,426 miles of rivers and streams or 23% of the total miles of all rivers and streams in the country. Most were perennial water bodies that flow all year, though some of the assessments were conducted in non-perennial streams that only flow during wet periods. States and tribes rate water quality by comparing data to standards. These standards are in place so that they have something t... Free Essays on The Clean Water Act Free Essays on The Clean Water Act The Clean Water Act: Is it Working to Keep our Rivers and Streams Safe? Growing public awareness and concern for controlling water pollution led to enactment of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. As amended in 1977, this law became commonly known as the Clean Water Act. The Act established the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States. It gave EPA the authority to implement pollution control programs such as setting wastewater standards for industry. The Clean Water Act also continued requirements to set water quality standards for all contaminants in surface waters. The Act made it unlawful for any person to discharge any pollutant from a point source into navigable waters, unless a permit was obtained under its provisions. It also funded the construction of sewage treatment plants under the construction grants program and recognized the need for planning to address the critical problems posed by non-point source pollution. This act lays the footwork for how we live day to day and how we are supposed to protect our country ¡Ã‚ ¦s water supply, but is it working? Are we working to protect our water supply? How clean is our water? In this paper I intend to answer these questions and others that relate to this act and also of its effectiveness. Water Quality Reports For a 1998 report, all 52 states, 2 interstate river commissions, Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, and 9 American Indian tribes rated water quality. These states and tribes assessed conditions in 842,426 miles of rivers and streams or 23% of the total miles of all rivers and streams in the country. Most were perennial water bodies that flow all year, though some of the assessments were conducted in non-perennial streams that only flow during wet periods. States and tribes rate water quality by comparing data to standards. These standards are in place so that they have something t...

To what extent can the Iranian Revolution of 1979 be considered the Essay

To what extent can the Iranian Revolution of 1979 be considered the root of Extremist Islam in Iran Today - Essay Example As a result, the Western Countries accused the Iranian people of spreading terrorism across the world. Since the Victory of the Iranian Revolution in 1979, it's marked a turning point to the Iranian people. They continued to remain firmed to their ethic based on the foundation led by Ayatollah Ruhullah Khomeini of Islamic extremism. Before the Islamic revolution of 1979, Iranian people were under the yolk of the capitalist and injustice, as at the time of Shah Phalavi. "Numerous symptoms led to the crumbling downfall of Shah Phalavi, ruler of Iran until 1978. One of these symptoms is rising expectations which can be seen during the 1960s and 70s. The rich Shah cleared the way for the land reform law, enacted in 1962. The land minority had to give up its land to the government, and among those stripped of land, were Shi'a Muslim". (The Iranian Revolution) However, Ayatollah the leader of the Islamic Revolution, during that time of Reza Shah Phalavi, was the spiritual leader of the Iranian people, especially the masses. Though he is Muslim, but the struggled he undergone against Shah has benefited the entire masses of Iran, both Muslim and Christians. Khomeini continued to condemned Reza Shah Phalavi and his policies. ... Though he is Muslim, but the struggled he undergone against Shah has benefited the entire masses of Iran, both Muslim and Christians. Khomeini continued to condemned Reza Shah Phalavi and his policies. He had also motivated the poor Iranians that the only way they will have a peaceful living is to adapting to Islamic extremism. Ayatollah's words had encouraged the people of Iran to waged uprising against Shah whom they regarded as an oppressive leader. Thy therefore joined the Ayatollah crusade against Shah under the Islamic platform. The continuous hatred against the West today by the Iranian government and its people today, their hatred against Jews, and the spread of Islamic extremism across the world they embark, was rooted since the 1979 Islamic Revolution led by Khomeini. In an interview with James Wasserman, where in his statements had made mentioned what he described as the root of extremism and terrorism in today's Iran and other part of the world. He has this to say: "The Iranian revolution of 1979 heralded the emergence of fundamentalist Muslim State and the proclamation of religious Jihad against the unbelievers and infidels. Wasserman further added: "Ayatollah Khomeini, the Shiite leader of Iran, must be seen in some measure as a successor of Hassan-i-Sabah. He was able to organize a band of powerless, stateless religious rebels into a group capable of overtaking one of the most powerful Militant machines of the Middle East that had the full support of the west. Khomeini also accomplished something that Hassan did not-the union of fundamentalist Shi'is and the fundamentalist Sunnis. When the modern Islamic terrorism Network was born, in large part directed Tehran, a thousands year-old dream was realized".